Legal Opinion
Panhandle Const. Co. v. Shireman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 11, 1935No. 4252PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
In 1919, appellees purchased acreage, property a short distance-east of the city of Lubbock and near what was then a county road. Thereafter, this road was designated as state highway Ño. 24. About 1932, an additional right of way was acquired for a public road, and samé was moved slightly south towards appellees’ property. The state at about this same time entered into a contract with appellant for the construction, grading, and drainage of said highway," according to certain plans and specifications. Appellant entered upon said right of way in the performance of said…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wood v. Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Salliotte v. King Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Adams & Sullivan v. SengelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Gay v. EngebretsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- City of Ashland v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Glade v. DietertTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State Highway Commission v. LA REYNOLDS COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Tidewater Construction Corp. v. ManlySupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Swilling v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.