Adams & Sullivan v. Sengel
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, First Division).
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Hurt
— Reversing.
In Angnst, 1914, the appellants, John II. Cahill, C. W. Adams, and John L. Sullivan, partners, doing business under the firm name of Adams & Sullivan, under a contract with the city of Louisville, for that purpose, undertook to open out and widen the bed of Bear Grass creek, at a point, within the corporate limits of the city, and where a lot owned by the appellee, Philip Sengel, adjoined the creek. There were situated upon appellee’s lot, in close proximity to the creek, several buildings, two of which appellee was wont to let to rent, and,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pickerill v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Board of Park Commissioner v. PrinzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Southern Railway v. Kentucky Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- City of Louisville v. HehemannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Langhorne v. TurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Trevillian v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Harlan County v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. LeaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- City of Ashland v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.