Burdette v. Broadview Dairy Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Respondent and his assignors were employees of the appellant, each employed at a salary of $90 per calendar month, and they, with one other, making a crew of four, were engaged in operating what is known as a “bottle washing machine,” and what is known as a “bottle filling machine.” The men were supposed to report for work at 9:00 o’clock a.m., and to continue until the day’s work was done. Usually in *159the forenoon they operated the bottle washing machine, completing the cleansing of bottles by the noon hour, and thereafter they operated the bottle filling-machine until the day’s supply of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shortall v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Brengman v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Hatcher v. Idaho Gold & Ruby Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Moran Bros. v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Powers v. MunsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Medex v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Rogers v. Savings First Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Smaby v. ShraugerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Backman v. Northwest Publishing Center, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Pillatos v. HydeWashington Supreme Court · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.