Legal Opinion

Pillatos v. Hyde

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1941No. 28465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was instituted to recover wages alleged to be due for labor performed for defendants by plaintiff in a coal mine in King county. Trial of the cause to the court resulted in findings of fact and judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendants appealed.

The facts are as follows: Samuel Hyde, who later organized a domestic corporation (Hyde Mines, Inc.) for exploitation of a coal mine in King county, employed respondent September 15, 1938, as a laborer in that mine which Hyde then held under option for lease. October 15, 1938, which was prior to the incorporation of the coal mine, Samuel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hancock v. YadenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Burdette v. Broadview Dairy Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Ass'n v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  2. Gardner v. Wells Fargo Bank NADistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
  3. SEATTLE PRO. ENG. EMP. ASS'N v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API