Hatcher v. Idaho Gold & Ruby Mining Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered February 21, 1918, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiff, in an action on implied contract for services, tried to tbe court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Tbe plaintiff Hatcber seeks recovery in our courts of tbe alleged reasonable value of services rendered by bim as a laborer for the defendant min*109ing company in the state of Idaho. The company defended by setting np an express contract of employment entered into in Idaho with Hatcher, by the terms of which he was to receive compensation in a specific manner and partially payable out of the proceeds of the company’s mine at which he worked. The mining company claims to have fnlly performed all it was required to do under the contract of employment and that, therefore, Hatcher cannot recover in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carstens Packing Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Benjamin Bank v. DohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Smaby v. ShraugerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Burdette v. Broadview Dairy Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Jeffrey v. Whitworth CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1955
- Mirgon v. SherkWashington Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.