Legal Opinion
Strong v. Laubach
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 11, 2006No. 05-6207PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
William and Carolyn Strong appeal from a district court order requiring them to return exempt workers’ compensation funds that they had collected through garnishment proceedings related to a judgment entered in their favor against Donald Laubach. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 1
I
The Strongs obtained a judgment against Laubach in 1994 in the amount of $484,432.29. The judgment was domesticated in the Western District of Oklahoma. As part of their post-judgment collection efforts, the Strongs initiated garnishment proceedings. The Strongs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Olcott v. Delaware Flood Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Robert C. Thorpe v. Bessie P. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Dang v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Niemi v. LasshoferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Vera v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Psm Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Progressive Direct Insurance v. StuivengaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- RMA Ventures California v. SunAmerica Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.