Legal Opinion

MMR HOLDINGS, LLC. v. City of Charlotte

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 2005No. COA04-1618Published

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

The sole issue raised in this appeal by petitioners MMR Holdings, LLC and Town & Country Ford, Inc. (collectively “T&C”) is the proper construction of the word “facade” in the zoning ordinance of the City of Charlotte. Because both the Charlotte Zoning Board of Adjustment (the “Board”) and the superior court defined the term “facade” in a manner that is at odds with the term’s plain and ordinary meaning, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Facts

T&C has operated an automobile dealership for many years on leased property in Charlotte, North Carolina currently owned by MMR…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. Johnston County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Willis v. City of Southport Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Ayers v. Board of Adjustment for RobersonvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Tucker v. Mecklenburg County Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API