Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Mecklenburg County Zoning Board of Adjustment
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 28, 2001No. COA00-1426PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
Respondents, Marshall Gus Thomas, Jr. and Rhonda Golden-Thomas, appeal the trial court’s reversal of a decision by the Mecklenburg County Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board).
The Board determined that respondents’ kennel is not a “commercial kennel” and is thus allowable in a district zoned multi-family residential under the Mecklenburg County Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance). The trial court, finding the kennel to be commercial, reversed the Board’s decision and issued a cease and desist order. We reverse the decision of the trial court.
The pertinent facts are as follows: Respondents…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Willis v. City of Southport Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- CG&T Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Graff v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Woll S. v. Monaghan TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Four Seasons Management Services, Inc. v. Town of Wrightsville BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Raleigh Rescue Mission, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Dobo v. ZON. BD. OF ADJUST. OF WILMINGTONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.