Legal Opinion

Philip Berryman v. Dean Rieger, C. Kukla, Diane Holzheuer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1998No. 96-2337PublishedCited by 478 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

In yet another in a long line of § 1983, interlocutory, qualified immunity appeals raising factual issues, we must first decide whether we have appellate jurisdiction. This depends on whether there is a pure issue of constitutional tort law to be determined separable from the factual issues. The District Court denied qualified immunity to a prison doctor and two nurses sued by the plaintiff, who claims that the defendants refused to give him medical treatment in retaliation for a lawsuit he had previously filed against another nurse. Our decision follows the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by478 opinions

  1. Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Shehee v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Carolyn Comstock v. Norris McCrary v. S. Thyagarajan and David HowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Everson v. LeisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Phillips v. Roane County, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

473 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API