Francis O. Day Co. v. Montgomery County
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
Appellant, Francis O. Day Co., Inc. (Day), appeals from the granting of summary judgment in favor of appellee, Montgomery County, Maryland, in respect to a claim for unjust enrichment filed by Day against Montgomery County.1 The factual predicate, in spite of appellant’s assertion, is not in dispute. In other words, the result would be the same under any interpretation of the facts. Thus, the issue was appropriately addressed below in a summary judgment context. Day, nevertheless, presents a unique basis for claiming relief under unjust enrichment principles.
*516Facts
Aldre, Inc.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Katz v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Leese v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Mogavero v. SilversteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. New Baltimore City Board of School CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Harford County v. Town of Bel AirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Bennett Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. NationsBank of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.