Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard D. Huttner, J.
In this personal injury action, defendant moves in limine during the damages portion of the bifurcated trial to preclude plaintiff from introducing into evidence X rays which do not comply with the authentication and notice requirements enunciated in CPLR 4532-a. Given the dearth of case law, this *894court feels constrained to elaborate upon its ruling from the Bench denying defendant’s motion.
CPLR 4532-a is not the only means by which X rays may be admitted in evidence. The last sentence of CPLR 4532-a provides that failure to comply with the rule’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Del Toro v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Harth v. Nicholas Liakis & Son, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- Spoar v. FudjackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Dana v. Von PichlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Meyers v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Restrepo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1989
- Kovacev v. Ferreira Bros. Contracting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Pardodefigueroa v. Turner Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006