Legal Opinion
Restrepo v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided December 26, 1989No. Claim No. 69819PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
In this action for veterinary malpractice, we must decide whether the “locality rule” extant in other professions applies to veterinarians as well as whether CPLR 2306 and 4518 (c) are applicable to animal hospitals. In addition, we must resolve whether the public interest in avoiding the delay or cancellation of horse races at a major metropolitan racetrack justifies a State veterinarian in abandoning treatment of an injured animal and, if so, whether just compensation must then be paid to the animal’s owners for the resulting destruction of its…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Toth v. Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fackler v. GenetzkyNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Loman v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Urbino v. San Juan Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
- Restrepo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Mathew v. Jerome L. Klinger, D.V.M., P. C.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.