Legal Opinion
Harth v. Nicholas Liakis & Son, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
B. Thomas Pantano, J.
Defendants move to vacate and set aside two notices of intention to introduce X rays into evidence which notices were served pursuant to CPLR 4532-a.
*218Third-party defendants join in the motion by a cross motion.
Plaintiff, in turn, cross-moves for an order that the X rays here in issue be deemed admissible.
CPLR 4532-a as presently in form provides as follows:
"In an action in which a claim for personal injuries is asserted, an X-ray of any party thereto is admissible in evidence provided:
"(1) that there is photographically inscribed on such X-ray the names…
2Cited by3 opinions
- People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Galuska v. ArbaizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Hoffman v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1988