Legal Opinion

Harth v. Nicholas Liakis & Son, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

B. Thomas Pantano, J.

Defendants move to vacate and set aside two notices of intention to introduce X rays into evidence which notices were served pursuant to CPLR 4532-a.

*218Third-party defendants join in the motion by a cross motion.

Plaintiff, in turn, cross-moves for an order that the X rays here in issue be deemed admissible.

CPLR 4532-a as presently in form provides as follows:

"In an action in which a claim for personal injuries is asserted, an X-ray of any party thereto is admissible in evidence provided:
"(1) that there is photographically inscribed on such X-ray the names…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Galuska v. ArbaizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Hoffman v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API