Legal Opinion
People v. Harley
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1925No. Docket No. 122PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Defendant was convicted of operating a public lodging house in the city of Highland Park without obtaining a license as required by an ordinance of that city. The case was tried before the circuit judge without a jury, and upon an agreed state of facts.
We quote from the record:
“It is agreed by the parties that defendant had no license as required by the ordinance herein in question and that the sole question raised is the constitutionality of the said ordinance No. 326, as amended, of the city of Highland Park, a copy of which is included in this record together with a copy of the pertinent…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- In re FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. VachonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lansing Municipal JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Altop v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Tower Realty, Inc. v. City of East DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Prawdzik v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.