Legal Opinion
People v. Osgood
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1930No. Docket No. 6915PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to recover a judgment against the defendants as the representatives of two decedents who had executed a bail bond in a criminal ease. The plaintiff pleaded its claim in two separate counts. In one count it pleaded that it had presented its claim to the defendant executrices. In the other count it omitted all allegations regarding presentation. The defendants demurred to each count, both generally and specifically. The demurrers were sustained and from a judgment entered thereon the plaintiff has appealed.
The plaintiff does not assert…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Modoc Land & Livestock Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. Kings County Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- In re the Estate of JacobSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Marin Healthcare District v. Sutter HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Kristovich v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Donnally v. Montgomery County Welfare BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.