Holsen v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The basic question before the trial court involved the 1958 amendment to the Frank H. Bercker Studios, Ltd. employees’ profit sharing and retirement plan providing that a participating employee who “intends to engage directly or indirectly” in a competitive business shall receive only 50 percent of his vested participating interest in the plan at the severance date. The trial court held that this amendment was violative on its face of sec. 103.465, Stats., which provides:
“A covenant by an assistant, servant or agent not to compete with his employer or principal during the term of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Lakeside Oil Co. v. SlutskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Voigt v. South Side Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Union Central Life Insurance v. BalistrieriWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by25 opinions
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Rollins Burdick Hunter of Wisconsin, Inc. v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Streiff v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Christopher J. Heder v. City of Two Rivers, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Wirsing v. KrzeminskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.