Legal Opinion

State v. Gilbert Sanchez

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided October 17, 2012No. 08-11-00380-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice.

Gilbert Sanchez was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of Jeanette Ribail. Sanchez moved for a new trial asserting, among other bases, that the jury charge was erroneous. Agreeing that the charge was erroneous, the trial court granted the motion for new trial. The State of Texas now appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by granting the motion for new trial because Sanchez did not establish that he was egregiously harmed. Because we conclude that Sanchez did not suffer egregious harm, we reverse the trial court’s order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Igo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Cynthia Ambrose, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  2. State v. Susan Marie SciaccaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Ambrose, CynthiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Barron, DavidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. David Barron v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API