State v. Cynthia Ambrose
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Cynthia Ambrose a new trial. The trial court granted Ambrose’s motion on the basis that the trial court failed to sua sponte submit an accomplice-witness instruction to the jury and that its failure egregiously harmed Ambrose. The State challenges both components of the trial court’s basis for granting the motion. Because we agree that the absence of an accomplice-witness instruction did not egregiously harm Ambrose, we reverse and remand the case to the trial court.
Background
In December 2012,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Nava, Andres MaldonadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Herron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Zamora, Jaime ArturoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Edward James Dwyer Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2017
- Ambrose, CynthiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Ambrose, CynthiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Ambrose, CynthiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Ambrose, CynthiaTexas Supreme Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.