Legal Opinion

Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Oakley Improved Building & Loan Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1936No. 6805PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

The question here is, whether appellee the Oakley Improved Building & Loan Company (hereinafter called the Oakley Company) is entitled to reformation of a fire insurance policy. The claim is grounded upon the following facts:

Josie Ramsey owned a house and lot upon which the Southern Ohio Loan Company (herein called the Southern Company) held a mortgage for $4,500. The house was insured against fire in appellant, the Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, to the amount of the mortgage. A printed mortgage clause was attached to the policy making loss payable to the Southern…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Hay v. . Star Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. R. E. Parsons Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. L. Lewitt & Co. v. Jewelers' Safety Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Randy Pearce v. Chrysler Grp. LLC Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. General Motors Corporation v. Swan Carburetor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  3. Hayes v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  4. Lusher v. SparksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Tokio Marine & Fire Ins. Co. v. National Union F. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API