Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Oakley Improved Building & Loan Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
The question here is, whether appellee the Oakley Improved Building & Loan Company (hereinafter called the Oakley Company) is entitled to reformation of a fire insurance policy. The claim is grounded upon the following facts:
Josie Ramsey owned a house and lot upon which the Southern Ohio Loan Company (herein called the Southern Company) held a mortgage for $4,500. The house was insured against fire in appellant, the Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, to the amount of the mortgage. A printed mortgage clause was attached to the policy making loss payable to the Southern…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hay v. . Star Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. R. E. Parsons Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- L. Lewitt & Co. v. Jewelers' Safety Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Randy Pearce v. Chrysler Grp. LLC Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- General Motors Corporation v. Swan Carburetor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Hayes v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Lusher v. SparksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Tokio Marine & Fire Ins. Co. v. National Union F. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.