Legal Opinion

Tokio Marine & Fire Ins. Co. v. National Union F. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 19, 1937No. 448PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant sued at law to recover loss upon a policy of reinsurance and appellee interposed an equitable defense seeking reformation of the insurance contract upon the ground that the policy had been issued through appellee’s mistake and inequitable conduct by the appellant. The equitable issue was first tried and resulted in a decree reforming the policy and denying the appellant’s claim for loss thereunder.

Both parties were insurance companies authorized to transact business in the State of New York. April 4, 1932, appellant issued to S. H. Kress & Co. a policy of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of the Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  5. Equitable Insurance Company v. HearneSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Cigna v. Exec. Risk Indemnity and Nutmeg Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Mawhinney v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  5. Osberg v. Foot Locker, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API