Flaxman v. Flaxman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BUSBY, X
In Flaxman v. Flaxman, 169 Okla. 65, 35 P. (2d) 950, we declared void that portion of a decree in a divorce action directing the payment of alimony in monthly installments. Our reason for so doing was that the sum ultimately to be paid was not fixed in the decree. The question of what, if any, alimony should be paid was left open for the determination of the trial court. Sub-seouent to our decision in the above-cited case, the divorced wife, Cordelia Flaxman, presented an application to the lower court seeking a determination of the question. The application was unsuccessfully…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Flaxman v. FlaxmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Elmore v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jackson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- Good v. GoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Alldredge v. AlldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Quarles v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Gilcrease v. GilcreaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.