Legal Opinion

DelConte v. Stefonick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 31, 1979No. 2340PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant, Vincent DelConte, contends that the trial court erred in sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections which alleged, inter alia, that the complaint did not conform to law because it failed to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the trial court and remand for further proceedings.

On March 9, 1978, appellant filed a complaint in equity seeking a preliminary injunction, damages and other relief. Sec Pa.R.C.P. 1017(a). On March 20, 1978, appellee filed preliminary objections to the complaint. See…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fried v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Schreiber v. Republic Intermodal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Murphy & Slota v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Di Sante v. Russ Financial Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bartanus v. LisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. McClellan v. Health Maintenance OrganizationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Weiss v. EquibankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Browne v. MaxfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. 412 North Front Street Associates, LP v. Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API