Legal Opinion

Westark Specialties, Inc. v. Lindsey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 1976No. 75-275PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

In this workmen’s compensation case, the Commission found appellee’s eye injury was compensable and the circuit court affirmed. The sole contention on appeal is that the court and the Commission erred in con-eluding the claimant sustained an injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment with the appellant Westark Specialties, Inc. It is argued that there is no causal connection between the accident-injury and appellee’s employment. Specifically, appellants aver “is such an injury so reasonably incidental to the employment that it meets the requirement of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herman Wilson Lumber Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Sneed v. Colson Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Townsend Paneling, Inc. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Southland Corp. v. HesterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barksdale Lumber Co. v. McAnallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Welch's Laundry and Cleaners v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Bagwell v. Falcon Jet Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  4. O. K. Processing, Inc. v. ServoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. San Antonio Shoes v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API