Southland Corp. v. Hester
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
This is a claim for death benefits under the workmen’s compensation law. The pivotal question is whether the employee’s death, assuming it to have been accidental rather than self-inflicted, arose “out of” his employment. The commission’s two-to-one decision allowing the claim wras affirmed by the circuit court.
The facts, stated most favorably to the appellees, are these: Buford Hester, the decedent, was employed by Southland Corporation, which was a distributor of milk and milk products. The record does not tell us much about Hester’s duties as an employee, except…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ætna Life Ins. v. BurnettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Highway Oil Co. v. State Ex Rel. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Owens v. Southeast Arkansas Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Hainbuch v. Acacia Mutual Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Security State Bank v. PropstSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gerber Products v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Owens v. National Health Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Westark Specialties, Inc. v. LindseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Adkins v. Teledyne Exploration Co. & Argonaut InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Hoerner Waldorf Corp. v. AlfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.