Legal Opinion

Southland Corp. v. Hester

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 12, 1973No. 5-6153PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a claim for death benefits under the workmen’s compensation law. The pivotal question is whether the employee’s death, assuming it to have been accidental rather than self-inflicted, arose “out of” his employment. The commission’s two-to-one decision allowing the claim wras affirmed by the circuit court.

The facts, stated most favorably to the appellees, are these: Buford Hester, the decedent, was employed by Southland Corporation, which was a distributor of milk and milk products. The record does not tell us much about Hester’s duties as an employee, except…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ætna Life Ins. v. BurnettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Highway Oil Co. v. State Ex Rel. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Owens v. Southeast Arkansas Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. Hainbuch v. Acacia Mutual Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Security State Bank v. PropstSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gerber Products v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Owens v. National Health Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Westark Specialties, Inc. v. LindseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Adkins v. Teledyne Exploration Co. & Argonaut InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Hoerner Waldorf Corp. v. AlfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API