Legal Opinion

Jones v. Goetz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 11, 2017No. 17-1256UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Carolyn B. McHugh, Circuit Judge

Curtis Deon Jones, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (§ 2241 application). Mr. Jones also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Construing Mr. Jones’s pleadings liberally, see United States v. Pinson, 584 F.3d 972, 975 (10th Cir. 2009), and exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Mr. Jones’s § 2241 application and deny his request to proceed IFP.

I. BACKGROUND

A.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dillon v. GilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
  2. Guzman-Dominguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
  3. Jackson v. HudsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  4. Jackson v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API