Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A.C.C.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2002No. 20000596PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice.

{1 Acting pursuant to a probation order that subjected A.C.C., a minor, to random searches, a probation officer searched A.C.C.'s backpack and seized a device used to inhale marijuana. Based on this seizure, the officer filed a delinquency charge against A.C.C. in juvenile court; A.C.C. then filed a motion to suppress the drug paraphernalia, arguing that the officer's search and seizure violated the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 14 of the Utah Constitution. The juvenile court denied this motion, reasoning that A.C.C. lacked a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brigham City v. StuartUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. MorenoUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. McAuliffeWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Amended October 15, 2014 State of Iowa v. Justin Dean ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API