Legal Opinion

United States v. Camille T. Lilley

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1978No. 77-1917PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENLEY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Camille T. Lilley, was indicted for obstructing correspondence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1702 (Count I), forging an endorsement on a check drawn on the United States Treasury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495 (Count II), uttering and publishing as true said forged check in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495 (Count III), and aiding and abetting each of the above three offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. Appellant was tried by jury in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. She was found guilty on Counts I and III but not guilty on Count…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. George Samuel Walter RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Emslie Leander Moore, United States of America v. Floyd Moore, United States of America v. Pieter Cornelis PannekoekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Harold L. Peek, Jr., and Susanna E. Peek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. William R. OjalaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. LaGrand v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Claude Leander RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. United States v. Danny Ray PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API