Legal Opinion
LaGrand v. Stewart
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1998No. Nos. 95-99010, 95-99011PublishedCited by 169 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge T.G. NELSON; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Arizona death row inmates Walter and Karl LaGrand appeal the district court’s denial of their petitions for writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction of these consolidated appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Walter LaGrand (Walter) and Karl LaG-rand (Karl) (collectively “the LaGrands”) were each convicted of first-degree murder, attempted murder in the first degree, attempted armed robbery and two counts of kidnapping. The Arizona Supreme Court gave this account…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Ignacio Alberto ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Sedley Alley v. Ricky BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- State v. SuttlesTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Hooks v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.