Hoberg v. City of Bellevue
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
We affirm the Superior Court’s decision that the City of Bellevue must grant a variance to Chester and Janice Hoberg allowing them to build a house on their nonconforming lot. The denial of the variance by the City’s Board of Adjustment resulted from an interpretation of the Bellevue Land Use Code that is contrary to law.
I
Under the Bellevue Land Use Code (BLUC), the minimum lot size for single-family medium density housing is 10,000 square feet. In July 1990, the Respondents (Hoberg) purchased a nonconforming triangular-shaped vacant lot measuring 7,391 square feet on Bellevue Way S.E., where…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Overton v. Economic Assistance AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Freeburg v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Marlowe v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Citizens To Preserve Pioneer Park, L.L.C. v. City of Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- PIONEER PARK v. Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Asche v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Asche v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- McTavish v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.