Legal Opinion
McTavish v. City of Bellevue
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 20, 1998No. 39321-9-IPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Peter and Jean McTavish wish to build a 52-unit residential development on a 21.9 acre parcel at 1121 Lake Hills Connector, Bellevue, Washington. The McTavish property is zoned R-3.5 with over 93 percent of the land area designated as protected areas or protected area setbacks under the sensitive area overlay district regulations of the Bellevue Land Use Code (LUC).
The sensitive area overlay district, LUC part 20.25H, establishes special standards and procedures for developing any site in a special flood district or coal mine area or which contains wetlands, riparian corridors, steep slopes,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. McCrawWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Spokane v. VauxWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Snohomish v. JoslinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Ford Motor Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Citizens To Preserve Pioneer Park, L.L.C. v. City of Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- PIONEER PARK v. Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. VillarrealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.