Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Keithley)

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1975No. S.F. 23079PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

The People seek review by writ of mandate (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (o)) of respondent superior court’s order suppressing evidence in a burglary prosecution (Pen. Code, § 459). The evidence (a stove) was seized during a search of defendant’s residence conducted pursuant to his purported consent. Respondent court impliedly found that defendant’s consent was the fruit of a poisonous tree—an unlawful interrogation. The sole question presented by this appeal is whether this implied finding is supported by substantial evidence. The writ is denied.

Defendant was arrested for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. PettingillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API