Legal Opinion

State v. Fairbanks

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2008No. 2006-1529PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} The issue presented in this case is whether reckless operation of a vehicle, R.C. 4511.20, is a lesser included offense of failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer, R.C. 2921.331(B), when the failure-to-comply charge is accompanied by a specification of causing a substantial risk of serious physical harm to persons or property pursuant to R.C. 2921.331(C)(5)(a)(ii). We hold that it is not.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} On October 12, 2003, appellee Paul Fairbanks was pursued by a police officer for driving his motor vehicle over the center line. While attempting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. WacOhio Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ClayOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. VariOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. Alvarez, 4-08-02 (10-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. SouthamOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API