Legal Opinion

State v. Jordan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2000No. 99-1668PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

R.C. 2923.17(A) sets forth the offense of unlawful possession of a dangerous ordnance and provides that “[n]o person shall knowingly acquire, have, carry, or use any dangerous ordnance.” The word “knowingly” establishes the culpable mental state a defendant must possess in order for there to be a violation of R.C. 2923.17(A). The definition of “knowingly” is found in R.C. 2901.22(B), which provides that “[a] person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lowe v. Bowers (In Re Nicole Gas Prod., Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API