Earney v. Brantley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
Petitioners, Earney, Cook, and Endamano, seek a writ of prohibition to the Probate Court to prevent consideration of a renewed petition for probate of a will. That pleading seeks an opportunity for the proponent of the will to cure “evidentiary deficiencies” outlined by this Court in our opinion reversing the decision to admit the will to probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Sharp, 306 Ark. 268, 810 S.W.2d 952 (1991). Following issuance of the mandate the proponent of the will returned to Judge Brantley and renewed her petition arguing that it was within the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alexander v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Pryor v. Hot Spring County Chancery CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Abernathy v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- In re Estate of SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Jordan v. Circuit Court of Lee CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Jordan v. Circuit Court of Lee CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997