State v. Henriod
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 In this case, the State petitions for extraordinary relief under rule 65B of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and rule 19 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. The State requests that we vacate the district court’s order that denied the State’s motion to allow a child witness to testify outside the defendant’s presence via closed circuit television. 1 The district court reasoned that such testimony violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The parties disagree over which precedent governs this issue.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Edward E. Bordeaux, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- People v. PhillipsColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. StockMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Blanton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Snow, Christensen & Martineau v. LindbergUtah Supreme Court · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.