Legal Opinion

Morris v. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1956No. Appeals, 48 and 49Published

1Opinion of the Court

384 Pa. 464 (1956)

Morris

v.

Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 6, 1956.

March 13, 1956.

Before STERN, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.

D. Malcolm Hodge, with him Hodge, Hodge & Cramp, for appellant.

Douglas D. Royal, with him Greenwell & Porter, for appellees.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE MUSMANNO, March 13, 1956:

The only subject for consideration on the appeal in this case is whether the jury should have been permitted to pass on the questions of negligence and contributory negligence. It is clear from the record that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Robb v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Steck v. City of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Nettis v. General Tire Co. of Philadelphia, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API