Ex parte J.W.B.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentParker, Justice
The goal of providing finality and stability for a child should not be obtained at the expense of a biological father’s legal and God-given natural rights, especially by means of judicially condoned lies and deception, as' occurred in this case. For that reason; I join Justice Murdock’s dissent.
MURDOCK, Justice
(dissenting).. I respectfully dissent based on the following:(1) D.W., the natural father in this case (“the father”), did as much or more than the law expected of him in holding him*793self out to the public as the father of the unborn child, B.W.B. (“the child”)» providing pre-birth…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.