Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. United States

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 22, 2001No. IP 99-1852-C-Y/SPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS

YOUNG, District Judge.

This Entry addresses the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on the Schmitts’ & Comp-tons’ Title to the Abandoned Railroad Right-Of-Way; (2) Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment; and (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. For the rea*391sons set forth below, the court grants Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; grants Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment; and grants Plaintiffs’ Motion…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Chemtall Inc. v. MaddenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Fisher v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  4. Sargent County Water Resource District v. MathewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API