Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Rembrandt Corp. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 30, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

Judge Elwyn Thomas, respondent, refuses to proceed in two cases presented before him styled as Rembrandt Corporation v. City of Sarasota, and Rembrandt Corporation v. Charles G. Stroheymer, as Tax Collector of Sarasota County. As a result these two original proceedings have been instituted in the Supreme Court praying that a peremptory writ of mandamus be awarded to compel respondent, as Circuit Judge, to assume and take jurisdiction of and proceed with the causes aforesaid pursuant to an executive order of the Governor made under Chapter 16053, Acts 1933, Laws of Florida, and Section 8 of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Melbourne State Bank v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Colcord v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Sanchez v. CallSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  4. State ex rel. J. D. Matheson & Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  5. State ex rel. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of Florida · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Gaines Construction Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  3. State v. County of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Margulies v. MarguliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Dade County v. TurnbullDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API