Legal Opinion

Farrell Ex Rel. Farrell v. Dome Laboratories

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1982No. 6117PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal concerns the validity of a superior court judgment amending a prior judgment of voluntary dismissal without prejudice. We conclude that the superior court abused its discretion in granting relief from the original judgment.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case was previously before the court. In Dome Laboratories v. Farrell, 599 P.2d 152 (Alaska 1979), we affirmed a superior court judgment dismissing Barbara Farrell’s (Farrell) suit against defendants (hereinafter referred to collectively as Dome) without prejudice. Farrell’s Civil Rule 41(a)(2)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Milton Lecompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Harriet H. Hoffman, of the Estate of Ivan M. Hoffman v. Anthony Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kahle v. John Deere Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Board of Com'rs of Cass County v. NevittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Morris v. MorrisAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Juelfs v. GoughAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API