Farrell Ex Rel. Farrell v. Dome Laboratories
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This appeal concerns the validity of a superior court judgment amending a prior judgment of voluntary dismissal without prejudice. We conclude that the superior court abused its discretion in granting relief from the original judgment.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case was previously before the court. In Dome Laboratories v. Farrell, 599 P.2d 152 (Alaska 1979), we affirmed a superior court judgment dismissing Barbara Farrell’s (Farrell) suit against defendants (hereinafter referred to collectively as Dome) without prejudice. Farrell’s Civil Rule 41(a)(2)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Milton Lecompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Harriet H. Hoffman, of the Estate of Ivan M. Hoffman v. Anthony Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kahle v. John Deere Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Board of Com'rs of Cass County v. NevittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Morris v. MorrisAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Juelfs v. GoughAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.