Legal Opinion

Morris v. Morris

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1995No. S-5592PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Albert Morris was mentally and physically incapacitated due to a workplace injury, for which he received federal workers’ compensation benefits. As the illness progressed, he was declared incompetent and Donna Morris, his wife, was named his guardian. He was placed in a nursing home, his caretaking paid by federal workers’ compensation. Donna filed for divorce, and a temporary guardian was named for Albert. Donna and the guardian agreed to a divorce settlement. Donna received all assets, including the family home and ninety percent of Albert’s monthly federal workers’…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Gravel v. Alaskan Village, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Miller v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Harrelson v. HarrelsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cook v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Zito v. ZitoAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Brotherton v. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API