Legal Opinion
State v. Henderson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 10, 2006No. AC 25865PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The pro se defendant, Daniel Henderson, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly rejected his claims that (1) the ten year sentence enhancement pursuant to General Statutes § BSaAOb1 was illegal as it was based on “uncounseled earlier charges,” (2) the sentencing court had failed to articulate any reason for enhancing his sentence pursuant to § 53a-40b, (3) he was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information, (4) the sentencing court should not have enhanced his sen*64tence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Orcutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Borrelli v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.