Smith v. Babbitt
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this action in order to challenge the final administrative decision of the Interior Board of Indian Appeals (“IBIA”), an adjudicative body within the United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”), regarding an heirship determination under the White Earth Reservation Land Settlement Act of 1985 (“WELSA”), 100 Stat. 61, as amended 101 Stat. 887, found as a note to 25 U.S.C. § 381. In its decision the IBIA determined that plaintiffs are not the heirs of the decedent, Esther Bellecourt…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lincoln v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Cherokee Nation of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilmore v. WeatherfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- McNabb v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Stanley F. Cermak, Sr. And Raymond Cermak, Sr. v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Kakaygeesick v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009