Royal Exchange Assurance v. Luttrell
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
J. E. Luttrell and Hendrie and Bolthoff Manufacturing and Supply Company sued Royal Exchange Assurance of London, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, on a policy of fire insurance and recovered judgment. The defendant seeks a reversal of the judgment.
The question presented is whether the policy was in force at the time of the fire that caused the loss. Plaintiffs contend, and the court held, that it was; defendant contends that it was not.
The facts were stipulated. So far as pertinent, they are as follows:
Luttrell, the owner of certain property situated in Craig, requested Leroy Tucker…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Waterloo Lumber Co. v. Des Moines InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Quoug Tue Sing v. Anglo-Nevada Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1890
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. TewesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
- Insurance Companies v. RadenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seattle-King County Council of Camp Fire v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Luttrell v. London & Provincial Marine & General InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936