Legal Opinion

People v. Jansen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 31, 1986No. 85SA103PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEIGHBORS, Justice.

Under C.A.R. 4.1, the People appeal the district court’s order suppressing certain items of physical evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant issued by a county judge. The People argue that the trial court improperly shifted the burden of proof on the suppression issue from the defendants to the prosecution and that the motions filed by two of the defendants were facially insufficient. We reject the People’s contentions and affirm the trial court’s ruling.

I

Before summarizing the facts pertinent to this appeal, we will trace the course of the proceedings which preceded…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. People v. ThiretSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. AsheUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Roose v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Hoffman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API