Legal Opinion
In Re Refrigerant Gas Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided November 18, 1971No. Docket 76PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman * , and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel.
2Per curiam
In civil and criminal antitrust actions filed in the Northern District of Ohio, the United States alleges a conspiracy among the six manufacturers of refrigerant gases, wholesalers of the gases and the wholesalers’ trade association to monopolize and to restrain trade and commerce in refrigerant gases for replacement purposes. 1 The criminal' indictment names only the trade association,…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
- In Re Master Key Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Litigation Involving Motor Vehicle Air Pollution Control EquipmentUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
- In Re Hotel Telephone Charge Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
- In Re Texas Gulf Sulphur Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
- In Re Toilet Seat Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975