Legal Opinion
In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided January 5, 1973No. 120PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, * Chairman, and JOHN MINOR . WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.
The Nissan Motor Corporation, distributor of Datsun automobiles and parts in the United States, moves for the transfer of two antitrust treble damage actions against it to the Central District of California. The plaintiffs, whose actions were filed in the Southern District of New York and the Southern District of Florida, expressed no strong opposition to transfer but suggested that one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Multidistrict Civil Antitrust Actions Involving the Distribution of Scotch WhiskeyUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- In Re Refrigerant Gas Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In re CBS Licensing Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- In Re Nissan Antitrust Litigation. P. D. Q., Inc. Of Miami v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U. S. A. And Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- In Re Nissan Motor Corp. Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- United States v. DinneenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- In Re Clark Oil and Refining Corporation Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.