Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Di Stefano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 16, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Claimant was hired as a motor vehicle salesperson. It was agreed after his first few days of work, however, that the overcrowded working conditions caused by renovations to the employer’s showroom rendered it advisable for claimant to take a leave of absence and resume his position after the renovations had been completed. Claimant was contacted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of HellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of WaiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of IannarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of McKeonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Matter of Reisen (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API