Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Heller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 26, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiv*792ing unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Whether a claimant has refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause is a question for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and its resolution of that inquiry, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld (see, Matter of Gray [Roberts], 130 AD2d 904, 905). Here, the employer’s representative testified that claimant, who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re the Claim of D'AllesandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of Di StefanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re Claim of CheeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API