Legal Opinion

Gerrow v. John Royle & Sons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 2002No. 5 EAP 2001PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Chief Justice ZAPPALA.

This case involves the interplay of the coordinate jurisdiction rule and Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1035.3 (response to motion for summary judgment).

This is a products liability case in which Appellees sought damages for serious personal injuries suffered by Appellee, David Gerrow, when molten silicone rubber exploded from an extruder manufactured by Appellants. The accident was al*137legedly due to the defective design of the extruder which allowed the rubber to clog the machine, causing the explosion.

The action was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Goldey v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Ryan v. BermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Middletown Athletic Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Kurian ex rel. Kurian v. AnismanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. ANTHONY BIDDLE CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Preet Allied American Street, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. ViglioneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Windows, H. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API